On Thursday 11 November 2010 4:49:46 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > Dan, > > I can't believe that anyone is using it the way I wrote it, and I > consider the old behavior pretty seriously broken. So, I'd like to > take the position that 2.3.1 is mopping up some 2.3.0 leftovers, and > go ahead and push it out. If someone complains, I'll add compatibility > control code for 2.3.2. Lunch is on me if anyone notices.
OK. Done. :-) Dan > > --benson > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > > Benson, > > > > In your opinion, should CXF-3056 be merged to 2.3.1 or not? You > > mention it's not exactly compatible so I'm guessing not, but I'd like to > > make sure. > > > > If not, we'll need to start the 2.4 migration guide and add the note > > about it. > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > dk...@apache.org > > http://dankulp.com/blog -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog
