We've got canned XML being checked, I'll have to recan some of it.

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Sergey Beryozkin<[email protected]> wrote:
> This one
>
> testWriteTo(org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.AegisProviderTest)
>
> also fails....
>
> Hudson provides some strange info....
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/CXF/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK15/676/
>
> shows that Benson's changes has made it into the build but
>
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/CXF/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK15/676/org.apache.cxf$cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs/
>
> shows that no changes has been applied
>
> Sergey
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Kulp" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Benson Margulies" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 6:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Handling collections with Aegis in JAX-RS
>
>
>> On Fri August 21 2009 12:52:32 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
>>> It appears to be you. I ran mvn in rt/databinding/aegis again, and
>>> still no hate mail from hudson as well.
>>
>> No.  He's refering to the
>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.AegisJSONProviderTest
>> in the jaxrs frontend.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Sergey Beryozkin<[email protected]>
>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Benson
>>> >
>>> > I'm seeing all the Aegis write tests failing at the moment....Or is it
>>> > only me ?
>>> >
>>> > cheers, Sergey
>>> >
>>> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benson Margulies"
>>> > <[email protected]>
>>> > To: <[email protected]>
>>> > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 5:00 PM
>>> > Subject: Re: Handling collections with Aegis in JAX-RS
>>> >
>>> >> All fixed now.
>>> >>
>>> >> I finally remembered the history of this. When you first inveigled me
>>> >> into working up the Aegis provider, I got as far as this test, and
>>> >> sent you email saying, 'OK, you fix the test, and I'll work out the
>>> >> rest of the kinks.' And then if you even fixed up the test I missed
>>> >> the email, so I never went back to it.
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>

Reply via email to