Well, I've always liked technical writing that uses 'you' to avoid the
passive. Since this is a config error, it seems to me to have an audience
that can handle a you. But that's just my opinion.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Christian, usage of "you" is somewhat uncommon in error messages, wouldn't
> you say?  Although I think it's more permissable for the first two messages
> below, because you're asking a question, but normally the latter two should
> avoid "you".
>
> Glen
>
> cschneider-2 wrote:
> >
> >  DISPATCH_FAILURE_MSG = Dispatch of incoming JMS request failed
> > +INSUFFICIENT_CONFIGURATION_CONDUIT = Insufficient configuration for
> > Conduit. Did you configure a <jms:conduit name=\"{0}\"> and set the
> > jndiConnectionFactoryName ?
>
> Be sure to configure a ... and set the jndiConnectionFactoryName.
>
> > +INSUFFICIENT_CONFIGURATION_DESTINATION = Insufficient configuration for
> > Destination. Did you configure a <jms:destination name=\"{0}\"> and set
> > the jndiConnectionFactoryName ?
>
> Be sure to configure a ... and set the jndiConnectionFactoryName.
>
> > +JMSCONFIGFEATURE_ONLY_JMS = You can only use JMSConfigFeature with the
> > jms transport
>
> JMSConfigFeature can only be used with jms transport.
>
> > +JMSCONFIG_REQUIRED = You have to set the property jmsConfig
>
> Property jmsConfig has to be set -or- was not set -or- must be set
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r702656---in--cxf-trunk-rt-transports-jms-src%3A-main-java-org-apache-cxf-transport-jms--test-java-org-apache-cxf-transport-jms--tp19869512p19869512.html
> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to