Well, I've always liked technical writing that uses 'you' to avoid the passive. Since this is a config error, it seems to me to have an audience that can handle a you. But that's just my opinion.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Christian, usage of "you" is somewhat uncommon in error messages, wouldn't > you say? Although I think it's more permissable for the first two messages > below, because you're asking a question, but normally the latter two should > avoid "you". > > Glen > > cschneider-2 wrote: > > > > DISPATCH_FAILURE_MSG = Dispatch of incoming JMS request failed > > +INSUFFICIENT_CONFIGURATION_CONDUIT = Insufficient configuration for > > Conduit. Did you configure a <jms:conduit name=\"{0}\"> and set the > > jndiConnectionFactoryName ? > > Be sure to configure a ... and set the jndiConnectionFactoryName. > > > +INSUFFICIENT_CONFIGURATION_DESTINATION = Insufficient configuration for > > Destination. Did you configure a <jms:destination name=\"{0}\"> and set > > the jndiConnectionFactoryName ? > > Be sure to configure a ... and set the jndiConnectionFactoryName. > > > +JMSCONFIGFEATURE_ONLY_JMS = You can only use JMSConfigFeature with the > > jms transport > > JMSConfigFeature can only be used with jms transport. > > > +JMSCONFIG_REQUIRED = You have to set the property jmsConfig > > Property jmsConfig has to be set -or- was not set -or- must be set > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r702656---in--cxf-trunk-rt-transports-jms-src%3A-main-java-org-apache-cxf-transport-jms--test-java-org-apache-cxf-transport-jms--tp19869512p19869512.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >