On Monday 06 October 2008, Richard Opalka wrote: > The license is LGPL Which isn't useful for us. We cannot ship LGPL jars.
If we HAD to change, we'd probably have to pull all the container stuff out into some sort of Abstract notion and then allow Spring/Plexus/Etc.. to be plugged in. Either that or enhance the non-spring stuff to make it completely usable without spring. Dan > Cheers, > > Richard > > >> It's open well tested MC implementation that is loosely coupled > >> with JBoss AS. > > > > ...and is LGPL-licensed, perhaps? It's not clear from the project > > page, and the Legal Notice in the User Guide merely contains a > > human-readable address. > > > > --oh -- J. Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
