Correct. Mine are harmless. On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's a couple commits to trunk that I'd like some verification that > they should go to 2.1.x before I do so. > > 1) > r699289 | bimargulies > Some preliminary work on attributes > r700981 | bimargulies > Incremental creeping toward attribute support in Javascript. As usual, in > spite of the XmlSchema situation. > > This looks like it's just adding support for attributes and thus looks > safe to merge to 2.1. (javascript wasn't on 2.0.x so no need to merge > there) Correct? > > > 2) A BUNCH of commits to the JMS transport - they are all localized to > the JMS transport and don't touch the jms tests in systest. Thus, it > looks like none of the old configuration "broke". However, can > Christian comment on whether he thinks what is there is "safe" > (performance and general compatibility wise) to merge down? I'd really > like to get the Spring based JMS stuff down into the 2.0.x if possible > (to alleviate some of the suckiness of the jms config), but not if it's > going to break everyone. > > > -- > J. Daniel Kulp > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
