I never received the email you mentioned. I assume this will affect the API call to NLM for UMLS validation? If it does, why not take the NLM's model for UMLS and only require UMLS credentials at the time of download?
Greg-- On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:33 PM Peter Abramowitsch <pabramowit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All > > Probably all of you have received an email from Patrick McLaughlin at the > NLM regarding upcoming changes to the UMLS authentication they are going to > support and to retire. This will have implications for all cTakes users > in different ways depending on how cTakes is implemented in your > community. To me, there were some ambiguities in his email regarding > usage situations as a registered content provider that needed to be spelled > out. > > I was wondering if any of you have had further conversations with him which > might clarify whether, for instance, users within a registered content > provider installation would still need to be individually authenticated. > Or on any other authentication scenario. > > I'm trying to contact him or his team at the moment to ask about our > particular architecture. > > Regards, Peter > -- Greg M. Silverman Senior Systems Developer NLP/IE <https://healthinformatics.umn.edu/research/nlpie-group> Department of Surgery University of Minnesota g...@umn.edu
