> I'd rather not get into the definition of "basic", just like I'd rather not > discuss the definition of obvious with another mathematician. --> Lol. My wife can't stand it when I say "obviously".
Fwiw, I think that cutting a new rc sooner rather than later is comparatively little work compared to the benefit for testers. It needs to be done anyway as what is in rc2 is not releasable. I don't want to vote -1 on the rc, but will if it is necessary to get an rc3 cut. Sean -----Original Message----- From: James Masanz [mailto:masanz.ja...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 9:36 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Release Apache cTAKES 4.0.0 (rc2) these are all the fixes I plan to make. last I talked to Sean, he had all his changes in. I assume there will be more testing up until final vote, I certainly will be doing more testing and working more on documentation. But why not have people test on the latest now that we have fixed some issues that seem like showstoppers? I'd rather not get into the definition of "basic", just like I'd rather not discuss the definition of obvious with another mathematician. On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Pei Chen <chen...@apache.org> wrote: > James, > Happy to create another rc3, but can I suggest we bundle all of the > fixes before creating another candidate? Are there other remaining > items to test? This just seems like basic functionality? > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 8:04 PM, James Masanz <masanz.ja...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > -1 from me for rc2 because of various issues found > > old dictionary lookup didn't work in an IDE unless you manually > > download the latest zip - pom files needed updating (checked into > > trunk > > today) (more of the ctakesresources from sourceforge need to be put > > onto maven central for ctakes to work as a maven dependency) > > Sean fixed some issues today (I saw commit notices today) which > > I'd like to see included in 4.0 before it's released > > > > -- James > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Pei Chen <chen...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate > >> (rc2) as Apache cTAKES 4.0.0. > >> > >> For more detailed information on the changes/release notes, please > visit: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache. > >> org_jira_secure_ReleaseNote.jspa-3F&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3 > >> xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4f7d4gT > >> ao&m=ba097K3Ff5NJE_fKkqDp_KlqaE2ZYHmHwMN9zXpR2A8&s=UysXDJxyZLqXPkgd > >> XXnHhwHUOl9QlNlwEhNHgti7unw&e= > >> projectId=12313621&version=12340211 > >> > >> The release was made using the cTAKES release process documented here: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ctakes.apache. > >> org_ctakes-2Drelease-2Dguide.html&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3xh > >> KwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4f7d4gTao > >> &m=ba097K3Ff5NJE_fKkqDp_KlqaE2ZYHmHwMN9zXpR2A8&s=fIq5eXz-SfJlhVLIwE > >> cyCvFBbXzhgDSobUXBLQd4J-A&e= > >> > >> The candidate is available at: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.or > >> g_repos_dist_dev_ctakes_ctakes-2D4.0.0-2D&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM > >> 69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4 > >> f7d4gTao&m=ba097K3Ff5NJE_fKkqDp_KlqaE2ZYHmHwMN9zXpR2A8&s=X5tWr5mjLa > >> aF0ox740Z4Qm5A0vgmBG52xJhjwZvDiYk&e= > >> rc2/apache-ctakes-4.0.0-src.tar.gz > >> /.zip > >> > >> The tag to be voted on: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__svn.apache.org_ > >> repos_asf_ctakes_tags_ctakes-2D4.0.0-2Drc2&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7popl > >> M69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd > >> 4f7d4gTao&m=ba097K3Ff5NJE_fKkqDp_KlqaE2ZYHmHwMN9zXpR2A8&s=UK2KK8Yem > >> 20C6Ai8CJd358-kgZFai3uOLcwnuzKBw9Q&e= > >> The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.or > >> g_repos_dist_dev_ctakes_ctakes-2D4.0.0-2D&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM > >> 69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4 > >> f7d4gTao&m=ba097K3Ff5NJE_fKkqDp_KlqaE2ZYHmHwMN9zXpR2A8&s=X5tWr5mjLa > >> aF0ox740Z4Qm5A0vgmBG52xJhjwZvDiYk&e= > >> rc2/apache-ctakes-4.0.0-src.tar.gz.md5 > >> /.zip.md5 > >> > >> The signature of the tarball can be found at: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.or > >> g_repos_dist_dev_ctakes_ctakes-2D4.0.0-2D&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM > >> 69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4 > >> f7d4gTao&m=ba097K3Ff5NJE_fKkqDp_KlqaE2ZYHmHwMN9zXpR2A8&s=X5tWr5mjLa > >> aF0ox740Z4Qm5A0vgmBG52xJhjwZvDiYk&e= > >> rc2/apache-ctakes-4.0.0-src.tar.gz.asc > >> /.zip.asc > >> > >> Apache cTAKES' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the > release: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.or > >> g_repos_dist_dev_ctakes_KEYS&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3xhKwEW1 > >> 4JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4f7d4gTao&m=ba > >> 097K3Ff5NJE_fKkqDp_KlqaE2ZYHmHwMN9zXpR2A8&s=8P4LDD2yEQaK6lMaYEA6rTC > >> gggyHgrnJAffyW9qLb04&e= > >> > >> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache cTAKES 4.0.0. The > vote is > >> open for at least the next 72 hours. > >> > >> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > >> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache cTAKES 4.0.0 [ ] -1 Do not > >> release the packages because... > >> > >> Also, the convenience binary can be found at: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.or > >> g_repos_dist_dev_ctakes_ctakes-2D4.0.0-2D&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM > >> 69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4 > >> f7d4gTao&m=ba097K3Ff5NJE_fKkqDp_KlqaE2ZYHmHwMN9zXpR2A8&s=X5tWr5mjLa > >> aF0ox740Z4Qm5A0vgmBG52xJhjwZvDiYk&e= > >> rc2/apache-ctakes-4.0.0-bin.tar.gz > >> /.zip > >> > >> I've only tested the CVD. Sean/James- Can you test/verify your changes? > >> > >> Special thanks to all of those involved. > >> -- > >> >
