Tonic!

-----Original Message-----
From: Joern Kottmann [mailto:kottm...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 5:15 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Update to OpenNLP 1.7.1

Yes, the version should be updated to 1.7.1 and the opennlp maxent dependency 
should be removed.
I prepared a patch yesterday and will open a jira tonight and attach it there.

Let me attach the patch, then I will ask for a review and if you don't mind I 
would then commit it myself.

Jörn


On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Andrey Kurdumov <kant2...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Joern,
>
> What changes needed to update to OpenNLP 1.7.1? Show I change only 
> pom.xml or something else?
> I would like to try it out. I maintain some kind of cTaks fork, 
> exactly for purpose of keeping up with dependency updates, until they 
> land in the Ctakes itself.
>
> 2017-01-26 4:00 GMT+06:00 Joern Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > yes I did a lot of testing to make sure that 1.7.0 and 1.7.1 are as 
> > good as any other OpenNLP release.
> >
> > The OpenNLP eval tests use all the data we currently support to 
> > ensure it all works. If you have some specific corpora you need to 
> > be sure OpenNLP performs well on we can try to add them to the 
> > evaluation tests.
> >
> > Looks like to update we need to change the version and remove the 
> > maxent dependencies. The maxent part is not integrated into opennlp- 
> > tools.
> >
> > The existing models dating back to 1.5.0 are supported and should 
> > work just as good. In some rare cases we fixed obvious bugs which 
> > can affect the performance but this should be really minor.
> >
> > In case you have the data I would like to encourage you to retrain 
> > with 1.7.1, and otherwise you are also fine with the 1.5.x models.
> >
> > Also I can dedicate some time to ensure the corpora you are using 
> > are supported by the OpenNLP formats package.
> >
> > Your POS Tagger readme is mentioning GENIA, do you still use that?
> >
> > The POS Tagger these days can also be trained directly on the Penn 
> > Tree Bank, but you could also use OntoNotes.
> >
> > Should I sent you a patch to update your poms?
> >
> > I also noticed you are not using the opennlp-uima integration, is 
> > that not working for cTAKES? We could try to find a solution which 
> > works for you without duplicating our effort.
> >
> > Jörn
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 18:43 +0000, Finan, Sean wrote:
> > > Hi Jorn,
> > >
> > > Great idea!  Have you done any testing with the latest release?  I 
> > > think that ctakes has 3 dependencies on opennlp libraries.  We 
> > > should try to get our integration with that update (and others) 
> > > solidified for the upcoming release.  The boston children's 
> > > hospital nlp team just gained a new member who will be devoting a 
> > > significant amount of time to a 3.2.3 (or 3.3.0) release of 
> > > ctakes.  He is James Masanz, one of the original developers of 
> > > ctakes, and we are extremely happy to have him onboard.
> > >
> > > Thank you for the notification,
> > > Sean
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Joern Kottmann [mailto:kottm...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 4:52 AM
> > > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> > > Subject: Update to OpenNLP 1.7.1
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > the OpenNLP team just released a new version and I would like to 
> > > propose to update cTAKES to it.
> > >
> > > The release should be fully backward compatible. If you don't mind 
> > > I am happy to send you a patch to make it easier to migrate.
> > >
> > > The OpenNLP project also ships a UIMA integration which as far as 
> > > I can tell could be used by cTAKES directly.
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Jörn
> >
>

Reply via email to