Pretty sure this particular issue is caused by LVG being part of the test pipeline and the "URI is not hierarchical" bug from not having its files unpacked from the jar. A simple fix is to disable that test in code; a slightly more complex fix is to run the test with a modified pipeline that doesn't include LVG. Tim
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:51 -0500, Pei Chen wrote: > That's right. mvn compile and test should work fine. The benign test > failed error from junit tests is coming from install/package; it's > been there since the beginning of time [1]. It would be a nice to > have and remove the benign warning messages. If a proposed critical > patch release passes the regression tests, doesn't break any existing > behavior, enhances the project, and we have volunteers for RM, I do > not see these superious reasons as valid to block releases and keep > things moving along. > Sean: it would great if you can open a Jira and apply the patch; we > can always cut another release next time- I'll be happy to be RM for > that one whenever you feel it's' ready. > > [1] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__markmail.org_search_-3Fq-3Dctakes-2520mvn-2520package-2520-2DDskipTests-23query-3Actakes-2520mvn-2520package-2520-2DDskipTests-2Bpage-3A1-2Bmid-3Aoxgrkslhhjimpv4k-2Bstate-3Aresults&d=DgIFaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=Heup-IbsIg9Q1TPOylpP9FE4GTK-OqdTDRRNQXipowRLRjx0ibQrHEo8uYx6674h&m=xkJKj22zARpX6Nb06fIYl84-gdaEmosSya1Wa40jup4&s=HIc4d0eWT6Wv0UY2Ytxm_oq5c-sUzay1SSq7XE4rDtE&e= > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Andrey Kurdumov > <kant2...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > NP for broken build. Finally I manage to run it, so I just report issue so > > other don't have have to go through hoops like me. > > > > I just want to made small correction - mvn compile works. mvn test works > > too, but mvn package require -DskipTests. > > The problem with build is somehow related to how Maven package stuff, I > > suspect. > > > > Packaging failed for me at "Apache cTAKES Dependency Parser > > .................... FAILURE", I also attach report from Surefire with > > error. > > > > I will try to figure out why is that error happens, but it could take a > > while until I understand how Maven works. > > Thanks for prompt response! > > > > Also I start looking how cTakes working, and investigate dependencies > > between packages, and found following comment: "Temporary workaround: Adding > > in the system scoped libraries. Remove these once they are in Maven Central" > > in the ctakes-distribution\src\main\assembly\bin.xml . These comment related > > to dependencies which checked in in the source code, but for me seems to be > > that they are now on MAven Central See > > (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mvnrepository.com_artifact_net.sf.mastif_mastif-2Dzoner&d=DgIFaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=Heup-IbsIg9Q1TPOylpP9FE4GTK-OqdTDRRNQXipowRLRjx0ibQrHEo8uYx6674h&m=xkJKj22zARpX6Nb06fIYl84-gdaEmosSya1Wa40jup4&s=xZ3YWIU31z3w7M1FOLaGQLoCVngpvleCf9mPKdZXyeg&e= > > ). > > I saw issue > > > > CTAKES-185 > > > > which could be appropriate for that, and I could create patch for that > > change. During the course of my next project, very likely I would be > > involved in the activities similar to cTakes, so I potentially could > > contribute something back, so I try to familiarize myself with the project. > > > > > > > > 2016-12-13 19:30 GMT+06:00 Finan, Sean <sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu>: > >> > >> Hi Andrey, > >> > >> The requirement of skipping tests for a successful build is something that > >> all ctakes developers have stumbled across, but after initial setup we all > >> forget about it and it has never been handled. Apologies. > >> > >> The github mirror is something that would be great to have, but getting it > >> up has been a nightmare. The problem is that historically we have had > >> binary files that are larger than the 100MB limit enforced by github. > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__help.github.com_articles_working-2Dwith-2Dlarge-2Dfiles_&d=DgIFaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=Heup-IbsIg9Q1TPOylpP9FE4GTK-OqdTDRRNQXipowRLRjx0ibQrHEo8uYx6674h&m=xkJKj22zARpX6Nb06fIYl84-gdaEmosSya1Wa40jup4&s=i2JxC1bWoyzIpDK_jkYp7Y-lZHnbKjsvPP1EcWiO3d0&e= > >> > >> This causes github to reject the creation of the repository. > >> > >> I do think that, should somebody feel like putting in the effort, we could > >> work with apache infra and get a working solution ... possibly starting > >> with > >> 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and ignoring the rest of the history? Unfortunately I do > >> not > >> have the time to tackle the problem. > >> > >> Sean > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Andrey Kurdumov [mailto:kant2...@googlemail.com] > >> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 10:01 PM > >> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > >> Subject: Infrastructures questions. > >> > >> Hi, I very new to cTakes and interested to take a look at it, and maybe > >> create custom pipeline on top of it. Right now I checkout source code and > >> successfully build it, but have following question. > >> > >> Why mvn package does not run successfully for me until I exclude tests > >> from build? I'm not very good at Java, so maybe I miss something obivious. > >> > >> Also, you seems to be have not only SVN repository, but Git also ( > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_ctakes_&d=DgIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4f7d4gTao&m=v58bHfswf4lrCGRXVvbZcOuRlfxX4A2JFW3Y0a7wEy0&s=XzjL16KbCkVYgzwzcBN71XtHS-Bf5CtQ27hsmHKwizg&e= > >> ) but it is very outdated. I even initially think that project is dead, > >> since Git show activity only from > >> 2013 year! If you could restore Git, that would be awesome. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Andrey Kurdyumov > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
