This can easily be fixed in the OpenNLP Parser. Should we open an issue for
it?

Jörn

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Miller, Timothy <
timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:

> IIRC, the "couldn't find parse" message is internal to opennlp so we
> weren't able to turn it off, but then we create a simple flat analysis
> using POS tags for sentences with parse failures. You may need to verify
> this but that is to the best of my recollection.
> Tim
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Tomasz Oliwa <ol...@uchicago.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 3:01 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: cTAKES Couldn't find parse for:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am sometimes seeing the "Couldn't find parse for" message in the
> terminal from cTAKES, I assume it is from the MaxentParserWrapper.
>
> However, in the CVD I can still see the TreebankNode entries with a tree
> and nodes with a grammatical nodeType in these cases. How is this possible?
> What actually does happen when "Couldn't find parse for" occurs? What
> entries in the CAS do not get populated?
>
> You can try it with the following sentence in the CVD that triggers a
> "Couldn't find parse for":
>
> ". . . .  . . .  . .x . . .Claim .  ,. . ;, ;, ; ,.;, . . .Claim;,.;,
> Claim;, .; ,.; ,.; . ., Claim., ,.,;"
>
> Regards,
> Tomasz
>

Reply via email to