Hi Bandeep,

So you are successfully identifying the relations but need more human-readable 
output?
Try using the PropertyTextWriter.  It will output properties and relations in a 
more readable manner.  You can look at the code there to see the basics of 
grabbing and outputting relation information.  Basically:

JCasUtil.select( jcas, BinaryTextRelation.class ).forEach( r -> 
System.out.println( r.getArg1().getArgument().getCoveredText() + " " + 
r.getCategory() + " " + r.getArg2().getArgument().getCoveredText()  );

Sean

-----Original Message-----
From: Bandeep Singh [mailto:bsi...@phemi.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 6:21 PM
To: u...@ctakes.apache.org; dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Trying to find UMLS Relations

Hi All,

I am trying to run UML Relations Annotator specifically 
LocatioOfRelationAnnotator and getting follwoing raw output. Need some help in 
understanding the output .

*Sample Text*: The patient underwent a CT scan in April which did not reveal 
lesions in the liver

All I really want is sometrhing like *locationOf(Liver,leisons) *
*Output:*


LocationOfTextRelation -> id:0 category:location_of discoveryTechnique:0
confidence:0.0 polarity:0 uncertainty:0 conditional:false 
LocationOfTextRelation -> id:0 category:location_of discoveryTechnique:0
confidence:0.0 polarity:0 uncertainty:0 conditional:false 
LocationOfTextRelation -> id:0 category:location_of discoveryTechnique:0
confidence:0.0 polarity:0 uncertainty:0 conditional:false 
LocationOfTextRelation -> id:0 category:location_of discoveryTechnique:0
confidence:0.0 polarity:0 uncertainty:0 conditional:false 
LocationOfTextRelation -> id:0 category:location_of discoveryTechnique:0
confidence:0.0 polarity:0 uncertainty:0 conditional:false 
LocationOfTextRelation -> id:0 category:location_of discoveryTechnique:0
confidence:0.0 polarity:0 uncertainty:0 conditional:false TemporalTextRelation 
-> id:0 category:CONTAINS discoveryTechnique:0
confidence:0.0 polarity:0 uncertainty:0 conditional:false

Any suggestions would be really helpful.

Thanks,
Bandeep

Reply via email to