+1 for sure 

> On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Ted Strall <tstr...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
> 
> Going to Java 8 can provide a lot of benefit to an application like cTAKES.
> The new features added to Java 8 are a game changer in terms of doing data 
> pipelining. The streams functionality and the ability to do functional 
> programming gives you the opportunity get 'parallelism almost for free.'
> That means the jvm can use all the available cpu cores without the need to 
> explicitly write multi-threaded code, as long as you write functional style 
> code (which basically means no shared variables.) This style of writing code 
> would also make it easier to transition to a distributed processing 
> environment like Spark or Hadoop.
> Of course, to get the benefit of  'parallelism almost for free' would require 
> using streams when working with collections and files, along with refactoring 
> important pieces of existing code to do the same.
> 'Java 8 In Action' is a really great book to get up to speed on the new 
> features.
>      From: Pei Chen <chen...@apache.org>
> To: "dev@ctakes.apache.org" <dev@ctakes.apache.org> 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 2:00 PM
> Subject: Re: CTAKES-377 : Upgrade to Java 8
> 
> +1 upgrading to Java 8; been using it unofficially locally.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Finan, Sean
> <sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> Can anybody out there think of a reason why we shouldn't upgrade to Java 8?  
>> Please comment on Jira.
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-377
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Sean
> 
> 

Reply via email to