I don’t have an issue with the *-2 name. I also don’t have any objections to 
renaming it. 

It might be nice to keep the old dictionary code around for a release-worth of 
time but after that I would vote purging it. 
If someone needs it after that it’ll be accessible in the archived releases. 



On Jun 10, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Chen, Pei <pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:

> I think James has a fair point here.
> It may be worthwhile biting the bullet here and push forward.
> 
> Since this essentially will be a full replacement of the 
> ctakes-dictionary-lookup module, a good option maybe to just replace the 
> entire module now and rename the existing module to * _deprecated.
> How do folks feel about that?  In a nutshell, ctakes-dictionary-lookup-2 is a 
> faster algorithm with a simpler code base- and comparable results (Sean has a 
> full comparison in the documentation for those who are curious).
> 
> --Pei
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: britt fitch [mailto:britt.fi...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 5:42 PM
>> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Preparing for an Apache cTAKES 3.2 Release?
>> 
>> There is some documentation in the dictionary2 module under
>> /doc/DictionaryLookupHelp.{txt | docx} that gives some some details of the
>> different lookup implementation options within that module that I found
>> helpful.
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Masanz, James J. <masanz.ja...@mayo.edu>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Will ctakes-dictionary-lookup2 remain the name for the new dictionary
>> lookup or will it have a name that reflects the algorithm?
>>> 
>>> Is there a description of it that will help users to decide when to use one
>> dictionary lookup component vs. the other.
>>> 
>>> -- James
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chen, Pei [mailto:pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 12:34 PM
>>> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
>>> Subject: Preparing for an Apache cTAKES 3.2 Release?
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> The 3.2 release was slated to be release end of this month (Jun 21).
>>> Since I volunteered to be the RM for this release, just like the past
>> releases, I was planning to create a branch/tag next week from trunk and
>> dev can continue.
>>> Feel free to take a look at any outstanding Jira issues [1] that you may 
>>> want
>> to be included in this release.
>>> 
>>> Major changes include:
>>> CTAKES-197        Upgrade cTAKES to Java 7
>>> CTAKES-292        Integrate YTEX with cTAKES
>>> CTAKES-82          Add ctakes-temporal module (Time and Event Annotator +
>> DocTimeRel Property only?)
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-
>> 298?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%
>>> 203.2.0%20AND%20project%20%3D%20CTAKES
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:masanz.ja...@mayo.edu]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:34 PM
>>>> To: 'dev@ctakes.apache.org'
>>>> Subject: RE: Apache cTAKES 3.2 Release?
>>>> 
>>>> +1 to naming it 3.2
>>>> 
>>>> I'll review my JIRA items this week.
>>>> 
>>>> -- James
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Pei Chen [mailto:chen...@apache.org]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 10:14 AM
>>>> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Apache cTAKES 3.2 Release?
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I think there are a lot of items slated for the next release, I
>>>> suggest we make it 3.2 instead of another patch release.
>>>> 
>>>> I can volunteer to be the RM unless someone would like to take that up...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Main Changes pending for 3.2:
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-197        Upgrade cTAKES to Java 7
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-292        Integrate YTEX with cTAKES
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-82          Add ctakes-temporal module (Time and Event Annotator
>> +
>>>> DocTimeRel Property only?)
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-275        some of the older junit tests don't have the right
>>>> Project name in the run configurations
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-268        Fix SentenceDetector training with updated OpenNLP API
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-162        Command line scripts leave the user back one directory
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-241        NullPointerException in ctakes-assertion
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-288        Severity not set for DiseaseDisorderMention
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-239        Medication Modifiers do not have the offsets populated
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-94          refactoring assertion module to use a cleartk-based
>>>> analysis engine (and include evaluation)
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-232        change concept type
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-76          get third party dependencies into Maven Central
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-138        Remove 3rd party jars from our SVN
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-74          Tokenizer PennTreeBank breaks with certain apostrophes
>>>> in tokens.
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-225        Common Type System - Add field to save preferredText in
>>>> Segment
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-222        FirstTokenPermLookupInitializerImpl to suppot arraylist
>>>> of DictionaryLookupWindows
>>>> 
>>>> CTAKES-213        ModifierExtractorAnnotator should produce XxxxModifier
>>>> subtypes
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Full List:
>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-
>>>> 
>> 288?jql=project%20%3D%20CTAKES%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.2%
>>>> 
>> 20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20create
>>>> d%20ASC
> 

Reply via email to