+1 > so I was planning to update -----Original Message----- From: Chen, Pei [mailto:pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:27 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Explict version numbers instead of ranges in pom.xml
Hi, Are there any opposition to using explicitly dependency version numbers? Occasionally, I would get errors like the below: Failed to collect dependencies at junit:junit:jar:[4.10,4.10] Caused by: org.eclipse.aether.resolution.VersionRangeResolutionException: No versions available for junit:junit:jar:[4.10,4.10] within specified range In principle, I think it's nice to have explicit behavior otherwise, it can be hard to reproduce errors if we allow version ranges.... There were only 3 places in the pom.xml that allowed ranges, so I was planning to update those unless anyone has strong objections to it... --Pei
