I am able to run the UMLS pipeline just fine just now. Then when I changed my password on their site without changing my cTAKES setup, it then fails, so I verified that my copy was indeed going out to validate the password.
-----Original Message----- From: Miller, Timothy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 4:32 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: umls license issue Yeah that works fine for me. Sent from my iPad. Sorry about the typos. > On Apr 27, 2014, at 3:59 PM, "Masanz, James J." <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did you try your user ID/pwd in the interactive website > https://uts.nlm.nih.gov/home.html > > Is it possible you didn't do your annual thing and that your password was > invalidated? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Miller, Timothy [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 10:52 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: umls license issue > > As far as I can tell the service is up -- website seems working and stepping > through the code it actually sends and receives a response, but the response > is false! (as in, not valid). This same code that I ran successfully > yesterday! I'll keep poking around but if anyone else can try it today let me > know what you get. > Tim > > ________________________________________ > From: Chen, Pei [[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 11:36 AM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: umls license issue > > Have you tried visiting the URL directly from a browser? Very possible their > license validation service was down... > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 27, 2014, at 7:59 AM, "Miller, Timothy" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Overnight the UMLS license lookup code seems to not be working -- I was able >> to validate and run yesterday but today the same code causes a problem. I >> put a breakpoint in the validation code and saw that the correct values were >> filled in, and used that username and password to successfully log in to the >> UTS website. Anyone else have this problem today? Something wrong with the >> validation service maybe? >> >> Tim >>
