Probably an oversight. stephen
On 10/22/13 9:45 AM, "Tim Miller" <[email protected]> wrote: >One more issue is with conditional attribute of relations. It is in the >sharp annotation guidelines I have access to but not in the implemented >typesystem nor in the typesystem documents I have. Should there be a >conditional field alongside polarity and uncertainty for Relation? >Tim > >On 10/21/2013 03:28 PM, Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wrote: >> That's right. >> BinaryTextRelations connect Annotations. >> ElementRelations connect Elements. >> >> In practice we have only ever used Annotations and BinaryTextRelations. >> >> stephen >> >> >> >> On 10/21/13 2:20 PM, "Tim Miller" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure I understand the distinction between BinaryTextRelation >>>and >>> ElementRelation types. Is it the difference between the abstract >>> relation and a particular text instantiation? >>> >>> On 10/17/2013 02:33 PM, Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wrote: >>>> +1 creation of additional relation types, both BinaryTextRelation and >>>> ElementRelation. >>>> >>>> stephen >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/17/13 12:20 PM, "Tim Miller" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I noticed yesterday that the ctakes type system is missing some of >>>>>the >>>>> types from the SHARP annotations. This causes an error when we try to >>>>> read in data with those types with our reader. I created a JIRA for >>>>>the >>>>> issue here: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-250 >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts on whether I should just implement them or is there some >>>>> reason to have a more detailed discussion? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Tim Miller, PhD >>>>> Postdoctoral Research Fellow >>>>> Children's Hospital Informatics Program >>>>> Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School >>>>> 617-919-1223 >>>>> >
