Added: http://ctakes.apache.org/relatedresources.html
> -----Original Message----- > From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:masanz.ja...@mayo.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 10:04 AM > To: 'dev@ctakes.apache.org' > Subject: RE: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > ctakes.apache.org ? > > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: dev-return-1727-Masanz.James=mayo....@ctakes.apache.org > [mailto:dev-return-1727-Masanz.James=mayo....@ctakes.apache.org] On > Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (398J) > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:54 PM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: Re: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > ctakes.apache.org ? > > +1 makes total sense, should be a great way to show off the project. > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > ++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > ++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of > Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > ++++++++ > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: <Chen>, Pei <pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu> > Reply-To: "dev@ctakes.apache.org" <dev@ctakes.apache.org> > Date: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 7:45 PM > To: "dev@ctakes.apache.org" <dev@ctakes.apache.org> > Subject: RE: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > ctakes.apache.org ? > > >+1 for a Related Resources with public links. > >There have been a couple of recently accepted/published papers that can > >illustrate what could be done with cTAKES which would fit nicely into > >that page... > >________________________________________ > >From: Girivaraprasad Nambari [girinamb...@gmail.com] > >Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:15 PM > >To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > >Subject: Re: how do you feel about putting public presentations on > >ctakes.apache.org ? > > > >I think it would be good to have a page on Wiki with title something > >like "Related resources" (Apache Mahout has similar page I guess) and > >add relevant "public" links here. I know we can't pull everything to > >this page, but whatever core team thinks are valuable at least (or) > >referred while implementing the code. > > > >I think this page will give high level overview on what frameworks > >developers need to be aware of while using ctakes. > > > >For example, we can add following links: > > > >https://code.google.com/p/uimafit/wiki/GettingStarted > >http://knowtator.sourceforge.net/quickstart.shtml > > > >And some links related to "SVM" and "MaxEnt" related information > >etc.,(Which were referred by original implementer). > > > >This way people who want to extend/add new features and referring > >existing implementation will be able to go through these to get > >understanding on what is happening inside ctakes. > > > >Thank you, > >Giri > > > > > > > > > > > >On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Andy McMurry <mcmurry.a...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > > > >> Argument FOR: > >> > >> Videos can also be very educational for new users! > >> For example, this cTAKES description by Guergana : > >> https://vimeo.com/24829353 > >> > >> Publishing our slides or video -- for example recent the NLP > >>presentations from the i2b2 user group -- gives folks a very real > >>sense of the kinds of problems we are currently working on. > >> A lot of people can't make it to these events. The slides are on the > >>web anyway, just harder to find if you dont know already. > >> > >> Argument AGAINST: > >> > >> Sharing your ideas before they are published in a journal can be bad > >>for academic credit! > >> Make every effort to separate the scientific research from > >>engineering product. > >> There is little value in sharing an idea without an implementation > >>anyway, this is already complicated enough with stable software. > >> > >> ~~~ > >> I can see both perspectives. > >> Curious what others think about this. > >> > >> --Andy > >> > >> > >> > >>
