As a result of the CTAKES-190 changes to the dictionary lookup [1], the 
relation extractor needs some refactoring and retraining. Probably we won't 
have a chance to get to that until after NAACL (June 9-15). So it would be best 
for us to target the 3.1 release towards the end of June.

Steve

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-190

On May 31, 2013, at 1:01 PM, "Chen, Pei" <pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:

> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES/fixforversion/12323276#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel
> 25/58 are either closed/resolved; there were a decent number of simple patch 
> fixes I think.
> 
> To spread the knowledge, perhaps another committer could be the release 
> manager (RM) for the next release.  Hint hint *James? ;)
> 
> --Pei
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:masanz.ja...@mayo.edu]
>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 4:41 PM
>> To: 'dev@ctakes.apache.org'
>> Subject: RE: Next cTAKES release (3.1)?
>> 
>> 
>> The new CEM Instance Template population is not complete yet, but if 3.1 is
>> late May or June, it will be.
>> 
>> Also, is the GUI close enough to being ready for prime time that it would
>> have a chance to be in 3.1?
>> 
>> -- James
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dev-return-1506-Masanz.James=mayo....@ctakes.apache.org
>>> [mailto:dev- return-1506-Masanz.James=mayo....@ctakes.apache.org]
>> On
>>> Behalf Of Chen, Pei
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 7:56 PM
>>> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
>>> Subject: Next cTAKES release (3.1)?
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> I just wanted to gauge the interest of creating the next release of
>>> cTAKES
>>> (3.1) which is currently marked for May in Jira-
>>> 
>>> There have already been 22/53 issues [1] marked as fixed or closed.
>>> Plenty of bug fixes and new components including:
>>> - New CEM Instance Template population
>>> - New Dependency Parser/Semantic Role Labeler
>>> - New optional Clear POSTagger
>>> - New regression testing component
>>> 
>>> Should we wait for the Temporal component?
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.1%2
>>> 2%20
>>> AND%20project%20%3D%20CTAKES
> 

Reply via email to