Thanks Nick, the guide is awesome! ermouth
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:48 PM Nick Vatamaniuc <vatam...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's true, good point, ermouth. Yeah, set the concurrency to 1, and also > to ensure it won't be picked up by other channels (slack vs ratio), so > maybe set the concurrency to 0 for those. > > Besides the docs on the site there is also an smoosh operator's guide in > https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/main/src/smoosh/operator_guide.md > that might have some more details about scheduling compactions, though > there is a chance some might be outdated a bit. > > -Nick > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 4:23 PM ermouth <ermo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for the prompt response! > > > > To clarify further: does [smoosh.%db_related_channel%] concurrency=2 mean > > one still might need 1Gb even with 2 shards? > > > > ermouth > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:11 PM Nick Vatamaniuc <vatam...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi ermouth, > > > > > > Yeah that should reduce the maximum disk space needed for compaction > and > > > might be a good reason to split the shards into smaller ones. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > -Nick > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 1:43 PM ermouth <ermo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > Does sharding affect minimal required disk space during DB compaction > > > > operation? > > > > > > > > I mean if one has 1Gb in 1 shard it would likely require ~1Gb free > disk > > > > space to perform compaction. If a DB had 2 shards ~500Mb each, would > it > > > > reduce minimal required free disk space to ~500Mb? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > ermouth > > > > > > > > > >
