My own vote: +1 Ubuntu 22.04, x86-64, Erlang 23
Sig: ok Checksums: ok make check: pass make release: works Fauxton "Verify Installation": pass I think we need one more PMC member +1 vote to make it official. Thanks, -Nick On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 2:07 PM Nick Vatamaniuc <vatam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you, all for testing. It's looking encouraging so far! > > We happen to have some deb and rpm packages available as well from the > last CI on main > https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FFullPlatformMatrix/detail/main/438/artifacts/ > Those are plain rpm and deb packages not full yum or apt repos, but it > may be possible to use them for tests when the build dependencies are > not present or it's tricky to set things up. > > Cheers! > -Nick > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:39 AM Ronny Berndt <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > here is the missing „see below“ section: > > > > First run with error: > > > > PartitionViewUpdateTest [test/elixir/test/partition_view_update_test.exs] > > * test purge removes view rows (212.0ms) [L#80] > > * test view updates properly remove old keys (211.8ms) [L#9] > > * test query with update=false works (3352.6ms) [L#34] > > > > 1) test query with update=false works (PartitionViewUpdateTest) > > test/elixir/test/partition_view_update_test.exs:34 > > ** (RuntimeError) timed out after 30371 ms > > code: retry_until(fn -> > > stacktrace: > > (couchdbtest 0.1.0) test/elixir/lib/couch/dbtest.ex:423: > > Couch.DBTest.retry_until/4 > > test/elixir/test/partition_view_update_test.exs:63: (test) > > > > * test purged conflict changes view rows (264.5ms) [L#108] > > > > > > Running test again: > > > > PartitionViewUpdateTest [test/elixir/test/partition_view_update_test.exs] > > * test view updates properly remove old keys (888.7ms) [L#9] > > * test purged conflict changes view rows (315.8ms) [L#108] > > * test purge removes view rows (264.1ms) [L#80] > > > > ReshardHelpers [test/elixir/test/reshard_helpers.exs] > > > > PartitionHelpers [test/elixir/test/partition_helpers.exs] > > > > > > Finished in 2.1 seconds (0.00s async, 2.1s sync) > > 4 tests, 0 failures > > > > Merry Christmas. > > > > /Ronny > > > > > > > Am 23.12.2022 um 14:30 schrieb Ronny Berndt <ro...@kioskkinder.com>: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Windows 10 Pro / Version 22H2 / OS build 19045.2364 > > > Erlang 24.3.4.6 > > > Elixir 1.13.4 > > > Spidermonkey 91 > > > > > > sig: ok > > > checksums: ok > > > make check: ok (1 test fail at first run, see below) > > > make release: ok > > > build msi: ok > > > fauxton verify: ok > > > db & doc creation: ok > > > > > > Great work! > > > > > > /Ronny > > > > > > > > >> > > >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 12:11 AM Nick Vatamaniuc <vatam...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Dear community, > > >>> > > >>> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.3.0. > > >>> > > >>> Candidate release notes: > > >>> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.3.html > > >>> > > >>> Changes since RC1: > > >>> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/compare/3.3.0-RC1...3.3.0-RC2 > > >>> > > >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > > >>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the > > >>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig > > >>> right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on > > >>> community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be > > >>> made.) > > >>> > > >>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.3.0/rc.2/ > > >>> > > >>> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 > > >>> checksums. > > >>> > > >>> Please follow the test procedure here: > > >>> > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release > > >>> > > >>> Please remember that "RC2" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these > > >>> artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.3.0. > > >>> > > >>> Please cast your votes now. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> -Nick > > >>> > > > > >
