> more ideas? Michelle, you may say I‘m crazy, but... What if we:
- take this proto http://bit.ly/1iqHRt8 (works well in Chrome, FF, O) hosted on Cloudant, - improve it to usable state, - add comments, - add registration using social networks, - make it fly. We may even enforce comments to start with ‘Yes, and ’ – bit crazy idea, but it could be interesting social experiment ) > I am meaning the View part of the MVC CouchDB is extremely effective for MVVM architectures as well. Above example and ddoc.me/lab are both MVVM. ermouth 2015-09-14 21:34 GMT+03:00 Michelle Phung <[email protected]>: > Hi Eli, > > Yes, by design, I am meaning UI/UX/CHI/visual design. > I am meaning the View part of the MVC. :) > > I was meaning initially to create a space for people to give Fauxton > design suggestions, but we also have to consider the design of the website, > and also design of supporting documents, etc. > > Here is an example that Robert Kowalski shared with me: > https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/37 that i think is a helpful > example. > > > Michelle > > > > > On Sep 14, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Eli Stevens (Gmail) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > It would be helpful for me (and perhaps others, I think) if more > > examples/details were given about the intended audience and use. > > > > The emphasis on screenshots makes me suspect that "design" means > > "UI/CHI/visual design" rather than "software architecture," but it's > > still not clear exactly what would be considered on-topic for the > > proposed space (Fauxton? Couchapps? Anything with a CouchDB backend?). > > > > To my old-fashioned MVC brain, the model is separated from the view by > > the controller, which means that the choice of backing store doesn't > > impact the UI much. What criteria could I use to know if my project is > > on topic? > > > > I'm mostly interested because I'd like to know if I should lurk there > > too or not. :) > > > > Thanks, > > Eli > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Good morning, Michelle! > >> > >> That's really good idea to choose better platform for target audience > >> which simplifies main use cases. Should be interesting experiment (: > >> > >> The problem could be with the policy that all the ASF project > >> discussions should happens on ASF mailing lists. So, with using > >> thirdparty service, we need to workaround this somehow. That means > >> don't throw too far away your idea with design@ ML. > >> > >> Cannot say anything good or bad about medium or else platform, but +1 > >> such turn of events. > >> > >> -- > >> ,,,^..^,,, > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Michelle Phung <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I would like to open an account on a platform for CouchDB designers, > design advocates, and design enthusiasts. > >>> > >>> It is a place to discuss all things design related with respect to > CouchDB. > >>> It could be a good place for people to learn about design. > >>> > >>> there are some design threads on github, which let people comment, and > it supports inline comments with screenshots, but maybe some designers are > not on github. > >>> > >>> medium.com is another option. > >>> > >>> more ideas? > >>> > >>> Michelle Phung > > > >
