On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Nick North <nort...@gmail.com> wrote: > As they have now looked at CouchDb themselves, maybe there could be some > collaboration with them to create a larger QuickCheck test suite?
That would be cool on one hand. On the other, the most interesting features are provided with commercial version. I'm not sure that we'll be able to include it into our test suite. As for the features that are available in free version, with some additional work we can setup same fuzzy testing suite on top of the same eunit. It will be stupid and primitive, for sure, but simple. QC has a problem that without reading the docs and having some experience with it would be hard to write any test or understand what's going on there. Too high intro level may not encourage people to write tests for their contributions. Regardless the my pessimistic response, I think this would be great experience in anyway (: -- ,,,^..^,,,
