+1 on what Alex said ... I think we can ship 1.6.0. If things are going well, we will have another release soon where we can fix more stuff ...
Cheers Andy On 14 May 2014 00:56, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Robert Kowalski <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> Test Summary Report > >>>> ------------------- > >>>> ../test/etap/075-auth-cache.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 > Failed: > >>>> 1) > >>>> Failed test: 2 > >>>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 19 tests but ran 2. > >>>> Files=51, Tests=1198, 284 wallclock secs ( 0.53 usr 0.11 sys + 94.30 > cusr > >>>> 23.84 csys = 118.78 CPU) > >>>> Result: FAIL > >>>> make[1]: *** [check] Error 1 > >>>> make: *** [distcheck] Error 1 > >>> > >>> Ugh. Do we have any ideas about this? > >> > >> Probably, another floating test failure, but I couldn't reproduce it > >> no matter how I tried. > > > > So are we going to say this is a fluke and we'll leave it for now? > > I would say yes (gritting one's teeth). We'd made not a single release > with a lot of floating issues. Hopefully few the most annoying ones > we'd fixed for 1.6, but we don't really know if this one is the last. > For 1.7 we will have new, better test suite - that's the goal. > > > @Robert > > If you have a chance, try to reproduce this failure in verbose mode: > ./test/etap/run -v test/etap/075-auth-cache.t > just wonder where it could fail for you. > > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > -- Andy Wenk Hamburg - Germany RockIt! http://www.couchdb-buch.de http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
