The way I read it, with IRC logs to back it up, is that there are changes checked in that fix these tests, yes.
As such I think we need to cancel rc.3. I need to understand if Alexander is saying "confirmed *fixed* for R14B01" or not - if fixed, we can probably move swiftly to an rc.4. -Joan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Cottlehuber" <[email protected]> To: "CouchDB Developers" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 4:40:56 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3 Hey Dirkjan, all, reading between the lines, are we aborting rc.3 as a result of these last 2 issues? On 30 April 2014 14:17, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mutton, James <[email protected]> wrote: >>> well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get: >>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t >>> .......... Failed 4/16 subtests >>> >>> Test Summary Report >>> ------------------- >>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t >>> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4) >>> Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15 >>> Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr >>> 13.16 csys = 169.38 CPU) >>> Result: FAIL >>> make[3]: *** [check] Error 1 >>> >>> Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for the >>> rest of the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going on >>> locally while on the flight. >> >> I'm failed to reproduce this with R14B04, but will try to R14B01 as you have. > > Confirmed for R14B01. > > > -- > ,,,^..^,,,
