So the tarball can't be generated and signed, pushed without announcing?
Shouldn't an official signed tarball be what the official packages are
built from? That was my understanding. Otherwise, the packages are being
build from git, and may not match the release. Or is the assumption made
that these are built from the rc artifact? I'm just asking for
clarification here, not seeing an issue.
Wendall
On 04/04/2014 09:32 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Wendal, we tend to wait if it's only going to be a short period. Has
more impact.
On 4 April 2014 18:19, Wendall Cada <[email protected]> wrote:
Since the vote passed shouldn't we have 1.5.1 tarballs available? I didn't
think that the official packages should hold up releasing the source
version. This is especially useful for other release folks building updates
for distros, etc.
Wendall
On 04/03/2014 02:28 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
On 03 Apr 2014, at 22:45 , Eli Stevens (Gmail) <[email protected]>
wrote:
Installs fine, old DBs still visible, install verifies.
It didn't automatically open in my browser, though (FF, beta channel).
I might have disabled that in a previous release? Not sure if that
was even possible. The checkbox in the menu was unchecked.
Yeah, it just reads the existing settings for that. I didn't change
anything
in the Mac UI bits :)
Thanks for testing!
Best
Jan
