On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure what prompted the urgency of this change but the vote was > aborted until we find a way to generate the new changelog correctly and > keep the old one. > > Note that I quite like to have the changes available on the doc (though it > could be duplicated to the root too), so not sure now that it's done what > should be done.
Okay, sorry for rushing that a bit. I wasn't clear on the timeline for Robert's email about retracting the point for 1.4. From reading the messages again, I don't really understand why we'd want to keep NEWS and CHANGES around. For me as a RM, keeping three places in sync is just a stupid chore, and I'd prefer not to deal with it. If people feel strongly about it, I'll happily re-add NEWS and/or CHANGES with contents populated based on what we accumulate in the docs. Cheers, Dirkjan
