Why not having both? I mean I don't want to have to read an RST to know how to install.
Having plain ascii is good imo. Also this is a common known place to find install docs. - benoit On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl> wrote: > Hi there, > > I think it would make sense to pull our installation documentation > into the larger docs effort. To guide people along, we can replace > INSTALL.Unix and INSTALL.Windows with an INSTALL file that points to > either the reST source and/or the generated HTML files. > > Any objections? > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan
