Not at all. After all, I do not do this for my personal interest, but for this community. I am glad if I can help.
Cheers, CGS On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, till <klimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, > > thanks, I'm gonna test this shortly. Do you mind if I push it one of my > repo? > > Till > > > On Monday, June 11, 2012 at 9:08 AM, CGS wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I isolated the tests which are started with make check and make them run > over the default installation under Ubuntu 12.10. Please, let me know if it > is what you need (there is a README file in the archive). > > > > CGS > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:46 PM, till <klimp...@gmail.com (mailto: > klimp...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > [ CC'd user@ to get more feedback. ] > > > > > > I made some progress. > > > > > > I have builds for the following more or less ready: > > > > > > * karmic > > > * lucid > > > * maverick > > > * oneiric > > > * natty > > > * precise > > > > > > It's building and I am trying to refine the process a bit. So it might > break in between [aka WIP]. I'm just adding this as a disclaimer. > > > > > > https://launchpad.net/~till-php/+archive/couchdb<https://launchpad.net/%7Etill-php/+archive/couchdb> > > > > > > Would you mind testing my builds? :) So far, I only tested lucid > briefly (and ran into the xulrunner issue, which I think I have auto-fixed > now). Besides I just started it up, created a DB and entered some docs into > it. > > > > > > (Also, @Jan:) > > > > > > I'm trying to figure out how to setup more automated testing. "make > check" always requires the source tree to be present, I'd like "make check" > against my installed binaries. I saw the "verify installation" in Futon – > something like that for the command line so I can iterate on these builds > and trigger a "test this" in a continuous integration setup. Building is > part of it, but since building a binary and installing it are two separate > steps I want to ensure that the second step also works. I am still trying > to wrap my head around a setup where I can maybe knife up a few instances > in THE CLOUD, install my package, run its test-suite and confirm. > > > > > > Till > > > > > > On Saturday, June 9, 2012 at 11:13 PM, CGS wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have CouchDB 1.2.0 with Erlang R15B01 on Ubuntu 12.10 up and > running. > > > > Unfortunately, I've never built a deb package, so, I cannot provide > such a > > > > package. Nevertheless, if you have any problem in building it, just > let me > > > > know and I will try to help. > > > > > > > > About the mailing list, I suppose adding the CouchDB users (to get > an idea > > > > which is the desired Ubuntu distro) and/or Debian (you may get > support in > > > > testing and debugging) lists wouldn't be such a bad idea, but it's > your > > > > call here. > > > > > > > > CGS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 9:15 PM, till <klimp...@gmail.com (mailto: > klimp...@gmail.com) (mailto:klimp...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > I've been scratching my own itch and started building 1.2.0 for a > couple > > > > > Ubuntu distributions. > > > > > > > > > > It's a WIP but I was wondering the following: > > > > > > > > > > 1) It builds – but does it work? Is the best bet to run the test > suite in > > > > > futon, or is there something I could run on the command line when > the > > > > > package is installed? I'd prefer the command line to include it in > some > > > > > sort of continuous testing without a browser. > > > > > > > > > > 2) Who'd have some interest in testing this? > > > > > > > > > > 3) Which distributions are wanted – I started with karmic and > lucid and > > > > > had planned to build all the way up to 12.10. > > > > > > > > > > 4) Is there a mailing list to discuss this, or is dev@ fine? > > > > > > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > Attachments: > > - couchdb_etap.tgz > > > > >