On 21.02.2012, at 22:38, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > I resolved the ipv6 ticket as 'cannot reproduce' given that two > committers have verified ipv6 replication with 1.2.x. Time for round > 2?
+1 > > On 21 February 2012 21:11, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are we blocked on anything else? Are we good to go? >> >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks guys, committed. >>> >>> Noah, 1.2.0 is unblocked on this one. >>> >>> On Feb 21, 2012, at 20:13 , Paul Davis wrote: >>> >>>> +1 on the patch to require admin for _changes. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> *nudge* >>>>> >>>>> I don't feel very confident with a single opinion (thanks Robert), and >>> would love your input on this one. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Jan >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 16, 2012, at 16:12 , Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 14, 2012, at 13:14 , Noah Slater wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Devs, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please outline: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - What remains to be fixed for regression purposes >>>>>> >>>>>> I want to bring up one more thing (sorry :). >>>>>> >>>>>> /_users/_changes is currently end-user readable. While >>> /_users/_changes?include_docs=true will not fetch docs the requesting user >>> doesn't have access to, it still gets all doc ids in the /_users db and >>> thus easily can generate a list of all users. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to propose to make /_user/_changes also admin-only before we >>> ship 1.2.0. Again, I'm happy to revisit and make things configurable down >>> the road. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that the information that a particular user is registered is >>> leaked (a user can't sign up with a username that is already taken, from >>> that it can be deduced that that particular username is already >>> registered). This is in line with most signup systems. Making >>> /_users/_changes admin-only doesn't prevent all leakage of what users have >>> signed up, but it stops bulk-leakage of *all* users in one swoop. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> Jan >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>
