[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13201204#comment-13201204
]
Jason Smith commented on COUCHDB-1397:
--------------------------------------
@All: I am fascinated and excited about the discussion of unit testing Couch
apps more easily. Would you mind moving this discussion to the dev@ and user@
list? (These JIRA tickets are sent there, so you can simply hit reply from your
mailer.)
@Dave, thanks again for your thoughts. In this thread, your arguments seem to
have resonated more strongly than mine. I hope you'll chew over Max's point
that, if our goal is more well-formed, valid Javascript as a means of exporting
functionality to a larger framework, then CommonJS should be a strong favorite.
> Function expressions, evals in SpiderMonkey
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-1397
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1397
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JavaScript View Server
> Affects Versions: 1.2.1
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Jason Smith
>
> New SpiderMonkey releases do not eval() a sole anonymous function expression.
> That is not a valid JavaScript statement, and so it is not a valid JavaScript
> script.
> COUCHDB-1302 addressed this for 1.1 and the 1.1.x branch. This ticket is for
> 1.2. (Sorry to spam COUCHDB-1302. I saw "Unassigned" and read "Unresolved.")
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
