On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:52, Randall Leeds <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 08:38, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Dec 7, 2011, at 4:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jason Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Thanks, Benoit. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to move the discussion back, one hundred percent, to >>>>>> identifying exactly what features are good and bad for CouchDB. We are >>>>>> in no hurry. IMHO, CouchDB does not need a patch soon. It needs >>>>>> thoughtful, deliberate planning. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> yes and no . We don't need to be 100% to start implementation. For >>>>> example we could just replace our current logger by lagger which would >>>>> give us automatically support for different backend, log rotations & >>>>> co and prepare for more attributes as well. >>>> >>>> Hi Benoit, let's respect Jason's request when he started this thread: >>>> >>>>> Seriously, please don't even mention a product or project by name. >>> > > I'm on board with this. Let's just whiteboard a little more. > I pretty much agree with everything specified so far. > > One point I would add (I didn't see it) is that it should be possible > to wholesale swap out the logging system with a compatible one via a > config change. > That's kind of in line with my thinking about couchdb in general these days.
That may actually be an unreasonable request and I'm not sure exactly what I meant by it. > >> >> Also I think we need some kind of CEP (couchdb enhancement proposal) >> like EEP but for couchdb to discuss about new features like this. So >> the people that propose that would have to do the job to be really >> clear, (without any mystic) and such thing. With the versionning >> advantage and comment on particular points. > > That could be interesting. Want to start a thread about it? I think > this ties in nicely with the momentum around documentation > improvements. > > -Randall
