Noah: All I really mean is that the docs/ are widely available. If it's infeasible to push them to the wiki then let's not do it, but I'd be surprised if that's a technical challenge for a group with our diverse superpowers.
As for choice of markup language, I have no preference. What's the minimum here? Do we need more than just plain text? The linux kernel's Documentation/ dir seems to get away with it. B. On 26 November 2011 19:47, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26 November 2011 14:25, Robert Dionne <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 for Latex > > Hi Robert, all, > > Thanks for taking the time to read all that! > > Specific design & tools aside, are you willing to support at least the > principle of upgrading/improvement of the documentation? > > Or are you fundamentally against docbook? Personally, I am agnostic on > the tool but I would like to know that I can contribute something that > won't require rework in future, and I'll happily learn tool X to > support that. > > I see little point in counting a few +1 votes and then making > wholesale changes; this should be a consensus otherwise I'd rather > revert to incremental changes to the wiki. > > A+ > Dave >
