[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050491#comment-13050491
]
Mike Leddy commented on COUCHDB-999:
------------------------------------
I noticed that what appears in the couch.log is somewhat difficult to
understand:
[Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:51:54 GMT] [error] [<0.886.0>] ** Generic server <0.886.0>
terminating
** Last message in was {'EXIT',<0.885.0>,
[68,117,112,108,105,99,97,116,101,115,32,111,
102,32,"1307433591F4608",32,100,101,116,101,
99,116,101,100,32,105,110,32,"iris",32,
"_design/admin",32,45,32,114,101,98,117,105,
108,100,32,114,101,113,117,105,114,101,100]}
** When Server state == {file,{file_descriptor,prim_file,{#Port<0.2581>,56}},
18063917287}
** Reason for termination ==
** [68,117,112,108,105,99,97,116,101,115,32,111,102,32,"1307433591F4608",32,
100,101,116,101,99,116,101,100,32,105,110,32,"iris",32,"_design/admin",32,
45,32,114,101,98,117,105,108,100,32,114,101,113,117,105,114,101,100]
The exit message is not being shown as a normal 'string' in the log.
> Detect view indexes with duplicates in them
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-999
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Database Core
> Affects Versions: 0.11.2, 1.0.1
> Reporter: Adam Kocoloski
> Fix For: 1.0.2, 1.1
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-Crash-if-duplicates-are-detected-during-view-compact.patch
>
>
> In COUCHDB-968 we discovered and fixed a bug that could introduce duplicate
> documents in a database. Under certain circumstances these duplicate
> documents would introduce duplicate entries in view indexes.
> We can detect duplicates in the view group by looking for duplicate entries
> in the docid => view key btree. We can try to repair the view indexes by
> removing the extra keys from the views, or we can just report that duplicates
> exist in the view group and direct the user to rebuild that group. We might
> incorporate this code into the view compactor, or we might release it as a
> separate standalone tool.
> I think my personal preference is to include any repair functionality in the
> view compactor. A separate standalone tool that simply reports the presence
> of duplicates would also be a nice thing to have.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira