[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12978519#action_12978519
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-1004:
-----------------------------------------
Yep, I know. What I meant was that an alternative solution which left
everything as atoms and used couch_util:to_existing_atom/1 would not need to do
the double-get_value thing, because the lookup for the binary key would never
succeed.
> list_to_existing_atom is too restrictive as used by couch_rep
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-1004
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1004
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Replication
> Environment: erlang
> Reporter: Bob Dionne
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: COUCHDB-1004.patch
>
>
> We'd like to additional information to db_info in BigCouch, such as the Q and
> N constants for a given database. This causes replication to fail when
> replicating from BigCouch to CouchDB due to the use of list_to_existing_atom
> in couch_rep:dbinfo(...
> The claim is that list_to_atom pollutes the atoms table, however superficial
> testing indicates this is not the case, list_to_atom when called repeatedly
> seems to work fine. If this is true then consider reverting
> list_to_existing_atom back to list_to_atom.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
