The vote has now closed. The results are:

Positive Binding Votes: 3

Bryan Ellis
Niklas Merz
Norman Breau

Negative Binding Votes: 0

Other Votes: 0

The vote has passed.



> On Jan 2, 2023, at 05:47, Norman Breau <nor...@nbsolutions.ca> wrote:
> 
> I vote +1:
> 
> * Verified Archive
> * Verified Tags
> * Ran NPM Audit (see notes)
> * Unit tests runs locally with 1 error (See notes)
> 
> NPM audit reports:
> 
> json5  <2.2.2
> Severity: high
> Prototype Pollution in JSON5 via Parse Method - 
> https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9c47-m6qq-7p4h
> 
> This comes from a sub development dependency of @cordova/eslint-config and 
> the issue exists on current production releases. Due to these reasons, I 
> don't consider this a blocker for this release and can be resolved on our 
> next release.
> 
> Regarding "pkgJson platform end-to-end with --save Test#012" failure, I've 
> investigated this issue and this is something to be addressed, but I do not 
> believe this issue is a blocker and can be resolved on our next release. In 
> short, message.split is a jasmine error because we are rejecting with 
> CordovaError. The underlying error is because we are testing an unrealistic 
> scenario, probably unintentionally. More details will be in a bug ticket.
> 
> On 2022-12-28 6:15 a.m., Niklas Merz wrote:
>> I vote +1
>> 
>> * signature & hash ok
>> * no audit issues
>> * license headers ok
>> * tag ok
>> 
>> Note: I have one failing test locally ->
>> 
>> 1) pkgJson platform end-to-end with --save Test#012 : platform with
>> local path is added correctly with --save
>>   - Unhandled promise rejection: TypeError: message.split is not a
>> function
>>       at <Jasmine>
>>   - Error: Timeout - Async function did not complete within 150000ms
>> (set by jasmine.DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL)
>>       at <Jasmine>
>>       at listOnTimeout (node:internal/timers:559:17)
>>       at processTimers (node:internal/timers:502:7)
>> 
>> Executed 81 of 81 specs (1 FAILED) in 5 mins 53 secs.
>> 
>> 
>> On December 26, 2022, Erisu <er...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Please review and vote on this cordova-lib release v11.1.0
>>> by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread)
>>> 
>>> The archive has been published to dist/dev:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/lib-11.1.0
>>> 
>>> The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
>>>  cordova-lib: 11.1.0 (d2e9c53945)
>>> 
>>> Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it
>>> to npm, and post the blog post.
>>> 
>>> Voting guidelines: https://github.com/apache/cordova-
>>> coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
>>> 
>>> Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
>>> 
>>> ====
>>> 
>>> I vote +1:
>>> 
>>> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
>>> * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and sub-
>>> dependencies have Apache-compatible licenses
>>> * Ensured the continuous build was green when repo was tagged
>>> * Ran `npm test`
>>> * Ran `npm audit`
>>> 
>>>  found 0 vulnerabilities
>>> 
>>> * Ran various `cordova` test w/ sample app:
>>>  * `cordova`
>>>  * `cordova -v`
>>>  * `cordova create`
>>>  * `cordova info`
>>>  * `cordova help`
>>>  * `cordova config ls`
>>>  * `cordova requirements`
>>>  * `cordova telemetry`
>>>  * `cordova plugin`
>>>  * `cordova plugin add`
>>>  * `cordova plugin rm`
>>>  * `cordova platform`
>>>  * `cordova platform add`
>>>  * `cordova platform rm`
>>>  * `cordova build`
>>>  * `cordova prepare`
>>>  * `cordova compile`
>>>  * `cordova run`
>>>  * `cordova serve`
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
> 

Reply via email to