+1 on cleaning old draft tags +1 on removing draft tags upon vote resolution (regardless of success or failure)
I don't have a strong preference for tag names, draft is fine to me, especially as the default... If we run into a specific case during a release discussion/vote where another tag name is preferable... we can be flexible enough to discuss that in a release discussion thread for that particular release. Norman Breau Software Developer nor...@normanbreau.com (https://link.getmailspring.com/link/5668e2c6-02cf-4e96-96fa-160f5c615...@getmailspring.com/0?redirect=mailto%3Anorman%40normanbreau.com&recipient=ZGV2QGNvcmRvdmEuYXBhY2hlLm9yZw%3D%3D) https://breautek.com (https://link.getmailspring.com/link/5668e2c6-02cf-4e96-96fa-160f5c615...@getmailspring.com/2?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fbreautek.com&recipient=ZGV2QGNvcmRvdmEuYXBhY2hlLm9yZw%3D%3D) On Aug 18 2020, at 9:40 am, Chris Brody <chris.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The name "draft" for tags in the release process is not that clear to me. > > > I suggest "rc" for release candidate. And yes we should clean these tags > > > up. > > -1 on "rc" on my part. I have seen other projects use "rc" to mean an > rc version that comes before a stable version. > > > During the vote, people can append which tag name they prefer. > +1 > > Anyways, I don't want this decision and vote to end like last time because > > of a tag name. > +1 (+100) > > > I am not sure about removing all tags without the rel prefix and not > > > creating these anymore. These are easy to remember and type tags to get a > > > specific version. Personally I would keep them and create them with the > > > new process after a vote too. "rel/x.x.x" are used for the Apache > > > archiving but I like the cleaner tags for users. > > > > I am trying to clean up the repos as well. Keep draft tags are not idea > > IMO. Some repos have 141 tags and half of those are most likely the draft > > tags which has a corresponding rel tag with identical commit ids. > > I would favor keeping both `x.x.x` and `rel/x.x.x` tags for the > existing releases that were not rejected. > > > > "rel/x.x.x" are used for the Apache archiving but I like the cleaner tags > > > for users. > +1. > Am I right that with this proposal, we would not need to make > `rel/x.x.x` tags for accepted releases after this proposal is > accepted? > > > I am not looking to remove the `rel/` tag process. That must remain and > > those tags will remain. > +1 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org >
