+1 The deprecation notice needs to be prominent, I missed it myself on a
quick scroll.
Some of that readme is in a specific format to support appearance in
docs.cordova.io ( similar to
https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/latest/reference/cordova-plugin-file/index.html
 )
This is no longer a requirement, so we can go prominent.
We should also ask INFRA to put the text [DEPRECATED] in the description,
and possibly even archive the repo.


On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:02 PM Norman Breau <nor...@normanbreau.com> wrote:

> I'm sure you're not the only one who misses it, considering the repo is
> still pretty active in terms of new issues being reported.
>
> On 2020-06-03 3:59 p.m., Darryl Pogue wrote:
> > Correction: There is in fact a deprecation notice, part-way down the
> > README, but it's not especially attention grabbing and I missed it the
> > first 2 times I skimmed the file.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:55 AM Darryl Pogue <dar...@dpogue.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> The File Transfer plugin has been officially deprecated since 2017:
> >>
> https://cordova.apache.org/blog/2017/10/18/from-filetransfer-to-xhr2.html
> >>
> >> However, the repo and npm have no link to that page or any sort of
> >> indication that it is not maintained.
> >>
> >> With the release of cordova-ios 6, the FileTransfer plugin no longer
> >> compiles on iOS:
> >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer/issues/258
> >>
> >> I want to reply to that issue saying that it's deprecated and not
> >> maintained, but I feel like we haven't made that very clear.
> >>
> >> I would like to propose that we update the README for File Transfer
> with a
> >> clear deprecation notice which links to the blog post from 2017, and
> that
> >> we ask ASF Infra to mark the repo as archived.
> >>
> >> Any objections?
> >>
> >> ~Darryl
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to