+1 ~ Kerri
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 12:27, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Bump. There can't be lazy consensus on this. Before I potentially waste > time on drafting a proposal, trying to feel the temperature on this change. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It's up to us to decide, and right now we require the iCLA except for >> trivial contributions. >> >> I want to change this to a more relaxed requirement: >> 1. Non-committers do not require an iCLA (you need one anyway to get an >> account, so that's really a non-issue) >> 2. Require a clear intent by the author to contribute under our normal >> terms, for a non-trivial change >> >> So some of you will be wondering, what does Apache say about this? >> From: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-infrastru >> cture-dev/201112.mbox/%3ca603ffce-623b-43e9-87f8-39baa51c7...@gbiv.com%3E >> >> Roy Fielding: >> "Yes, that opinion comes from me speaking as a board member and >> author of the Apache License, and has previously been cleared >> with Apache's legal team for a long ago discussion with Incubator. >> We don't need a CLA on file to accept contributions from non-committers. >> We just need a clear intent by the author to contribute under >> our normal terms." >> >> Other opinions: http://apetro.ghost.io/apache-contributors-no-cla/ >> >> We need to change our Contribute page: >> http://cordova.apache.org/contribute/ >> >> ... as well as any PR templates: >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-media/blob/master/. >> github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md >> >> This declaration of intent, if posted on Github, will be reflected on >> dev@cordova.apache.org since Apache sends out an email on each PR or >> comment to a PR, so we will be able to track it in our archives. >> >> As usual it is always the committer's responsibility to make sure that all >> code they push to a repository is compliant with ASF policies. >> >>
