+1 to expanding coverage, but we should stick to stable versions as Carlos notes.
@purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > What about node 4.0? That's the LTS (i.e. stable) version > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:42 AM Dmitry Blotsky <dblot...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > Hey folks, > > > > Richard and I came across a discrepancy today where some cordova-lib > tests > > were failing on a local machine but not on Travis or Appveyor, and we > > figured it was likely due to different Node versions (0.12 vs. 5.0). > > > > Are there any objections to expanding our coverage on Travis and Appveyor > > to run on both Node 0.12 and 5.0? > > > > Kindly, > > Dmitry > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > > > >