On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, we go with the lowest common identifier, assuming that the other > platforms may be added later. > Ahh, now that I read the source more carefully, I see that some Java-specific items are added at the end (at first glance, it looked like it just contained the list of C# identifiers) > Unfortunately you cannot use `in` as part of the id. > I would suggest `inleegan.helloworld` or drop the `in` completely. > It may also be possible to use in_.leegan.helloworld, which would be the traditional Java workaround, if 'in' was reserved there. > > My team is hiring! > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > > "in" is not a reserved keyword Java, but it is in C# -- are you building > a > > Windows Phone or Windows application? > > > > It looks like Jesse's https://www.npmjs.com/package/valid-identifier > > package is catching this. > > > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:57 AM, <heman...@leegan.in> wrote: > > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to use ".IN" domain in the APP ID while building the > Cordova > > > application. > > > > > > Whenever I try to use > > > > > > > > > > > > cordova create hello in.leegan.helloworld HelloWorld > > > > > > it says: > > > > > > App id contains a reserved word, or is not a valid > > > identifier > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to be that "in.leegan.helloworld" is not valid. > > > > > > > > > > > > How can I overcome this limitation ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Hemant Ganpule > > > > > > LEEGAN SOFTWARES > > > > > > Thane, India > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
