I believe we had this exact discussion regarding our app-hello-world. Ultimately we added it in: https://github.com/apache/cordova-app-hello-world/blob/master/www/index.html
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > What specific files? > The problem that I have is with adding license headers to template files is > that it *may* imply that the developer's app must be APL 2.0, these > typically are 'sample' files and the user is expected to change them ... > but expecting them to remove a license header as their first change is > kinda weird. > > > > > > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We should add license headers. > > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Tim Barham <tim.bar...@microsoft.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Currently these files are flagged by RAT. We should either add license > > > headers or exclude them (from RAT) to clean up the noise. They're small > > > pieces of template code used by plugman. The Apache rules for whether a > > > file needs to have a license header [1] specifies: > > > > > > > What files in an Apache release do not require a license header? > > > > A file without any degree of creativity in either its literal > elements > > or > > > > its structure is not protected by copyright law; therefore, such a > file > > > > does not require a license header. If in doubt about the extent of > the > > > > file's creativity, add the license header to the file. > > > > > > I don't think it could be argued that these files have *no* creativity > > > what-so-ever, so perhaps we should add license headers? > > > > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
