So...since nobody voted on this thread, I think it's safe to say the vote
failed.  We should probably re-start this soon.

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM Treggiari, Leo <leo.treggi...@intel.com>
wrote:

> Did the DISCUSS thread have a pointer to the release notes about whitelist
> support?
> Sorry that I missed that.
>
> Leo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:00 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>
> Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread.
>
> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo <leo.treggi...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
> >
> > The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist in
> > order
> > to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
> >
> > Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node component.
> >
> > The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
> > Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
> > Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
> >
> > It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
> >
> > Leo
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com <javascript:;>]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> >
> > Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
> > config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
> > their project?  If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
> >
> > Or does this just impact newly created projects?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Leo
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mmo...@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmo...@google.com
> > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> >
> > PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
> > whitelist changes are:
> > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
> >
> > Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> > notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
> > like).
> >
> > Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm.  Should we
> > document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> > >
> > > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> > >
> > > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> > >
> > > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > >     cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> > >
> > > Note that you can test it out via:
> > >
> > >     cordova platform add
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
> > >
> > > Blog post to review is here:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> > >
> > > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it
> to
> > > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> > >
> > > Voting guidelines:
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
> > >
> > > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> > >
> > > I vote +1:
> > > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> > > have Apache-compatible licenses
> > > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > > * Verified contents of archive
> > >
> >
> B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�
> > � [��X��ܚX�K  K[XZ[
> > �  ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y  ] [ۘ[  ��[X[� �  K[XZ[
> > �  ]�Z [   �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B
> >
>

Reply via email to