Github user kirkshoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-browser/pull/9#issuecomment-71892622
no prayer was involved.
As I said, if there are good scenarios for `cordova serve` then it should
continue to exist. You have explained that it should exist and I agree with you.
The scenarios for `cordova run browser` are different and require that the
project be hosted over http in the browser platform as well. Currently, a file
url is used which causes issues with CORS headers and other effects that cause
`cordova run browser` with a file url to behave completely differently than it
will when actually hosted as a web site. These differences need to be minimized
to ensure that more bugs can be reproduced and fixed locally.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
