On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri Dec 12 2014 at 10:25:51 AM Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > > > > I'm not actually worried about my disk filling up. Dependencies must be > > vetted for appropriate licenses, so now there's more overhead here. If we > > need to make a change to the module system now we need to poor through > docs > > and make PRs instead of just editing our very small code-base. > > > > > This mix of MIT and 3-Clause BSD looks compatible to me. It's weaker than > Apache, but not incompatible. Do we really need to send this to legal? > https://github.com/substack/node-browserify/blob/master/LICENSE > > There are people who can argue your other points better, but saying that > the license is the overhead when you can find it in the repo? I'm not sure > how we would have gotten this far if we had to check with legal for every > single dependency. > I meant that it depends on a bunch of other modules. Run license-checker on browserify and you get: http://pastebin.com/XDMCTRRb
