+1 with Marcel's suggestions. I've never liked the merges directory myself, but if others find it useful that's great. I would be happy to see it as an opt in feature.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > +1! > > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > SGTM as long as all the user needs to do to recreate it is a “mkdir”, and > > that is documented in all the right places. I like the aim of reducing > the > > temptation of devs to push buttons that aren’t needed in most cases. The > > visible surface area is more simple. > > > > On May 14, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@google.com> wrote: > > > > > I'm not proposing we drop support for merges/, I just think that many > > apps > > > don't use it so why show it by default? (We've done something similar > > for > > > .cordova/ where its still supported but not created by default unless > it > > > actually has non-default values) > > > > > > The way merges/ works right now is questionably useful (Michael Brooks > > had > > > a long post about that a while ago), and with hooks/ most apps can > > create a > > > much better alternative for themselves. > > > > > > So, not a big deal, but one fewer thing to learn for new devs, and less > > > temptation for them to try using it.. > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > -Michal > > > > >