+1 with Marcel's suggestions.

I've never liked the merges directory myself, but if others find it useful
that's great. I would be happy to see it as an opt in feature.


On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:

> +1!
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > SGTM as long as all the user needs to do to recreate it is a “mkdir”, and
> > that is documented in all the right places. I like the aim of reducing
> the
> > temptation of devs to push buttons that aren’t needed in most cases. The
> > visible surface area is more simple.
> >
> > On May 14, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not proposing we drop support for merges/, I just think that many
> > apps
> > > don't use it so why show it by default?  (We've done something similar
> > for
> > > .cordova/ where its still supported but not created by default unless
> it
> > > actually has non-default values)
> > >
> > > The way merges/ works right now is questionably useful (Michael Brooks
> > had
> > > a long post about that a while ago), and with hooks/ most apps can
> > create a
> > > much better alternative for themselves.
> > >
> > > So, not a big deal, but one fewer thing to learn for new devs, and less
> > > temptation for them to try using it..
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > -Michal
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to