+1 on Shaz if he wants to do it. I hope he has the bandwidth to continue his awesome technical contributions also.
I tip my hat to Brian for tremendous leadership in this community that is not just an open source project is a philosophy on what we believe as a community and and willing to dedicate time and effort to help others with contributions. --Carlos On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Mike Billau <mike.bil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks a lot Brian for driving the project and always trying to do what's > best for the community and the developers! Where's the beer fund I can > donate to? ;D > > +1 Shaz if he is willing! > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > > On topic: Big +1 to Shaz, a perfect fit. Also, thank you Brian for your > > efforts over the years and your work bringing the project through > > incubation. Thank you also for taking the decision to pass the torch. > > > > Off topic: Joe and Jim, please may you each put up email filters for the > > others' comments? Its almost entirely you two trolls yelling at each > > other, throwing salt in wounds, in every thread about cordova vs apache > > (actually they should be called Joe vs Jim threads). The problems with > our > > PMC and the Board are being blown way, way out of proportion I think. > > > > -Michal > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:36 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > > > > > Some of the Apache rules are build up of old > > > > policy that has become meaningless ceremony. > > > > > > This is not true. If you can provide examples of such "meaningless > > > ceremony" that still exists, please mention them. They will either > > > get removed, fixed or explained. > > > > > > FWIW, ALL policy has a basis in actual, tangible benefits > > > to the community. Believe it or not, we are as anti- > > > meaningless ceremony as you are. Why would we not > > > be?? We are all people who develop and hack. We are > > > not bureaucrats by choice or desire; we were *asked* > > > to take on bureaucratic roles so that other developers > > > didn't have to. And we care enough about the ASF to > > > do so, and add those duties onto our numerous other > > > duties as developers, committers, developers, PMC members, etc... > > > > > > -- Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com>
