On 9 April 2014 01:38, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > I suppose this will make it more obvious when voting has concluded, but it > puts the result out of the actual vote thread.
That's a pain - I'd not noticed that before. I'm a bit surprised that changing the subject has the effect of breaking the threading. I don't think that is supposed to happen. [Later] It seems that Google mail has changed the way it handles changes of subject, thereby breaking the threading. For an example of a [RESULT] mail (from Google) that is correctly threaded, have a look at [1] If you click on the << to the left of Thread you can see that it is properly threaded. Likewise in the mailbox display [2] - search for "based on RC2" However recent GMail replies no longer work properly. I suspect (hope) other e-mail clients don't break threading that way... [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/200802.mbox/%3C55afdc850802240403n4d6f3ae7o5bfa09bc6c3b3a53%40mail.gmail.com%3E [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/200802.mbox/thread?2 > Someone reading the vote > thread might not realize that the vote is closed if the result is not made > a part of the thread. Indeed, but when the conventiion was established at Apache, it worked as intended. Shame on Google for breaking it! > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:06 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The ASF convention is to change the subject line - as I have done here >> - to make it easier to find the result in the e-mail archives (and in >> user inboxes). >> >> Also the summary should please state whether there were any other >> votes, even if there were none. >> >> On 8 April 2014 18:03, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > The vote has now closed! The results are: >> > >> > Positive binding votes: 4 >> > Steven Gill >> > Ian Clelland >> > Michal Mocny >> > Bryan Higgins >> > >> > The vote has passed >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Bryan Higgins <br...@bryanhiggins.net >> >wrote: >> > >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > +1. >> >> > >> >> > (I noticed for format of sha and md5 files changed (coho patch to >> strip >> >> > weird pgp formatting), but the format now doesn't match either >> sha512sum >> >> or >> >> > pgp CLI tools. The contents do match so its fine) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@chromium.org> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > +1, plugman looks good from here. >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Steven Gill < >> stevengil...@gmail.com> >> >> > > wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > Please review and vote on the release of cordova-plugman. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > cordova-plugman@0.21.0 has been published here: >> >> > > > *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-6245/ >> >> > > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-6245/>* >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > The package was published from the corresponding git tag: >> >> > > > cordova-plugman: 0.21.0 (b2f3a130d3) >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Upon a successful vote I will upload plugman archive to dist/ and >> >> > publish >> >> > > > it to npm. I will then post a vote for the cordova-cli followed >> by a >> >> > > > corresponding blog post. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Voting will go on for a minimum of 24 hours. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I vote +1. >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>
