I don't have any problem with going the 3.4.1 route. It would be simpler in terms of docs + js.
Shazron, would that work for you? On Mar 28, 2014 8:27 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > From what I understand of the changes, it should work fine to do a 3.4.1 > and just leave the JS as is. > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It feels like trying to tag only iOS as 3.5.0 before the other platforms > > is going to create a mess when it comes time to release the other > > platforms, especially if there are subsequent changes to cordova-js > and/or > > cordova-ios. I don't like moving tags. So +1 to Michal's question. > > > > On Mar 27, 2014, at 9:56 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@google.com> wrote: > > > > > Before I even try to grok the other questions, why can't we just tag > iOS > > as > > > 3.4.1? > > > > Perhaps the long-term answer for doing away with the cadence release is > to > > version all the platforms separately, like how we do for the plugins now. > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> The best course of action for the future is to set the build label in > > >> cordovajs to be just the sha. > > > > Maybe in the future, the build label in cordova-js also floats separate > > from the versions of all the platforms. Yeah, perhaps it's just the sha. > > Every git repo has its own master and own independent versioning > sequence. > > > > That does beg the question if there is some kind of overall snapshot id > to > > replace the cadver, and when do we do Apache releases to dist. > > > > >
