On 2 June 2013 02:08, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > This should be done on the private list if you only want PMC members to > vote..
[Late reply, just happened to spot this] ASF voting takes place on public lists unless there is a very good reason to do otherwise - for example, voting on personnel issues or on security matters. Only PMC member votes count towards the official tally, but votes from other developers are welcome and should be considered by the release manager (RM) when deciding whether to proceed with a release. For example, if a (non-PMC) developer spots a serious bug or packaging error in the release candidate, then the RM can (should) decide to abandon the release candidate, even if it has already had enough votes to pass. Equally, if other developers are able to test the release and vote +1 that is useful information for the RM, even if the vote is not actually binding. > On 6/1/13 6:33 AM, "Luke Holmquist" <lholm...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>+1 >> >>Sent from my iPhone >> >>On May 31, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> A release candidate for 2.8.0 is available at: >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cordova/ >>> >>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Cordova 2.8.0. >>> >>> The vote is open for the next 3 days and passes if a majority of at >>>least >>> three +1 Cordova PMC votes are cast. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Cordova 2.8.0 [ ] -1 Do not >>>release >>> this package because... >>> >>> Here is my +1 >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -Steve >
