Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js?
On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: >I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. > >@purplecabbage >risingj.com > > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson ><bra...@chromium.org>wrote: > >> Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both >>cordova_plugins.js >> and cordova_plugins.json for a while. >> >> Braden >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org >> >wrote: >> >> > Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman >> > generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using >> > sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. >> > >> > In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the >> > change to use a .js file and <script> tag looks fine. It's hard to >>make >> > Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version >>of >> > cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? >> > >> > Braden >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS >> >> >> >> The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows >> Phone >> >> *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that >>Jesse >> >> converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to >> apache's >> >> master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to >> the >> >> cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach >> >> throws an "Access Denied" error on WP*. >> >> >> >> With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to >>include >> >> this bit of functionality. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL >> >> >> >> On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 >>that I >> >> >wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all >> the >> >> >rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I >>can >> >> get >> >> >that done. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to >>me. I >> >> >>will >> >> >> tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, "James Jong" <wjamesj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones >> Shaz >> >> >> >mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. >> >> >> >-James Jong >> >> >> > >> >> >> >On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> >> >> >>wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: >> >> >> >> - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. >>cb-3185) >> >> >> >> - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) >> >> >> >> - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and >>iOS >> >> >> >>(Jesse >> >> >> >> brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I was also planning on working on adding some >> Plugin-behaving-nicely >> >> >> >>checks >> >> >> >> on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends >> more >> >> >> >>than >> >> >> >> 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I >> >> clearly >> >> >> >>won't >> >> >> >> get this all done in the next few hours :P. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus >> more >> >> >>on >> >> >> >> 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some >>more, >> >> >>and >> >> >> >> hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm >> >> >>looking >> >> >> >>at >> >> >> >> you for the uploading a release part :P). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> >>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Thanks Jeff! >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz" >><jheif...@blackberry.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out >>CB-3797, >> >> >> >>>>CB-3799 >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, "Filip Maj" <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>> Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? >>I'd >> >> >>like >> >> >> >>>>>to >> >> >> >>>>> refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, "Bryan Higgins" >><br...@bryanhiggins.net> >> >> >>wrote: >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment >>settings >> >> >>from >> >> >> >>>>>> project >> >> >> >>>>>> to HOME. >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and >> >> >> >>>>>>committed >> >> >> >>>>>> within the next few hours. >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland >> >> >><iclell...@google.com >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could >> be a >> >> >> >>>>>>> candidate >> >> >> >>>>>>> for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that >>will >> >> >>accept >> >> >> >>>>>>>a >> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take >>care >> of >> >> >>it >> >> >> >>>>>>> post-rc1. >> >> >> >>>>>>> Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj >><f...@adobe.com> >> >> >>wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone >>still >> >> >> >>>>>>>>working >> >> >> >>>>>>> on >> >> >> >>>>>>>> something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, "Michael Brooks" < >> >> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Monday RC1 sounds good to me. >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron < >> shaz...@gmail.com >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Looking at iOS 2.9.0: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Definitely as you said: >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Then all iOS cli and docs issues. >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to >> >> >>investigate, >> >> >> >>> no >> >> >> >>>>>>> fix >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> yet) >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there >>is a >> >> PR >> >> >>to >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> investigate) >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in >>the >> >> >> issue, >> >> >> >>>>>>> to >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> evaluate) >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the >> reporter >> >> >>has >> >> >> >>>>>>> filed >> >> >> >>>>>>>> an >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe this Untappd issue: >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer < >> >> >> >>>>>>> lorin.beer....@gmail.com >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I >>am >> >> >>aware >> >> >> >>>>>>> of a >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> bug >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you >> want >> >> >>in? >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron >> >> >><shaz...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could say there was more velocity in the >>iOS / >> OS >> >> >>X >> >> >> >>>>>>> repos >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> but >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this >> >> week, >> >> >> >>>>>>> but if >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> that's >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to >>get >> >> >>more >> >> >> >>>>>>> issues >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved by rc2. >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> <lorin.beer....@gmail.com >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, let's tackle this early >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse >> >> >> >>>>>>> <purplecabb...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> meh >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @purplecabbage >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> risingj.com >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj >> >> >> >>>>>>> <f...@adobe.com> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huge +1! >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, "Joe Bowser" >><bows...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know this is pretty soon, but how does a >>2.9.0rc1 >> on >> >> >> >>>>>>> Monday >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> sound? >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is supposed to be a hardening release >> >> >> >>>>>>> anyway, I >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> don't >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> see >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why we shouldn't start with the RCs. >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts? >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >>>> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain >> >> >>confidential >> >> >> >>>> information, privileged material (including material >>protected >> by >> >> >>the >> >> >> >>>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or >>constitute >> >> >> >>>> non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone >> >> other >> >> >> >>>>than >> >> >> >>>> the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received >>this >> >> >> >>>> transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender >> and >> >> >> >>>>delete >> >> >> >>>> this information from your system. Use, dissemination, >> >> >>distribution, >> >> >> >>>>or >> >> >> >>>> reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is >> not >> >> >> >>>> authorized and may be unlawful. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
